Cosmo Landesman
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

By the standards of hype surrounding the release of a big summer movie for children, Wall.E, the latest animated film from Pixar (Toy Story), is in a class of its own. In America, even the sour cream of cynical critics are calling it “a masterpiece”. Its success at the American box office — where it has remained near the top of the charts since its release last month — suggests that the public agrees with them. So, as they used to say about the popularity of Elvis, can 50m fans be wrong? Yes.
Don’t get me wrong. I admire Wall.E. I respect it. I appreciate its ambition. I like the way it takes artistic risks and doesn’t pander to audiences’ hunger for films full of cutesy furry characters and furious action. It’s familiar without being formulaic. My problem is this: I just don’t love it.
Why? Because it’s too self-consciously artistic, too tasteful, too eager to be a masterpiece. It’s an animated film buff’s idea of fantastic animation. Directed by Andrew Stanton (Finding Nemo), it wants to be the 2001: A Space Odyssey of animation. Visually, it sets out to stun, with big, swirling galaxies and aerial views of decayed city landscapes — and it does. But something is missing.
The first half-hour is exceptional. I’ve never seen such a wonderfully downbeat film for kids. The mood is melancholic. An old show tune is playing, with that wobbly, forlorn quality of a song broadcast to a dead civilisation. Against a vast and deserted urban wasteland of rubbish and crumbling skyscrapers, we see the lone figure of Wall.E — a small, rusty robot with binocular-like eyes and caterpillar treads that allow him to zoom around.
He’s been doing the same job for 700 years: scooping up rubbish and pressing it into square cubes, which he stacks up into pointless patterns. Wall.E is the last working robot on earth, cleaning up the mess humanity has left behind. He is a lonely little guy whose only friend is a cockroach. We soon discover that Wall.E is not some mindless robot — he collects treasures from the trash. Like the Little Mermaid, Wall.E is enchanted by the detritus of human civilisation: a plastic fork, a Rubik’s Cube, a string of Christmas lights. Back in his home, we see Wall.E’s prize possession: a video tape of the musical Hello, Dolly!. These foolish, forgotten things have turned this robot into an incurable romantic. He longs for love, someone whose metallic pincers he can hold.
The underlying message of Wall.E is that the human race has forgotten about the things that make it human: songs, dancing, love and, of course, Mother Earth. So far, so very Pixar. There’s a curious paradox at the heart of its world-view that runs from Toy Story to this film. It’s a sense that humanity has fallen, if not from grace, then from a golden age when toys were toys and boys were boys. We have, it seems, lost the good old songs and the good old joys of childhood, abandoned them for the egregious, ephemeral pleasures of a driven corporate culture.
The film’s melancholic mood changes when a probe droid called Eve turns up on earth with a mission of her own. Sleek and chic, Eve looks like a curvaceous egg that any male robot would want to go to work on. She can fly faster than Superman and is equipped with a laser-shooting arm. Watching her in action, Wall.E sighs, as if to say: “Wow, what a girl!” If Eve were human, she’d be Angelina Jolie; if Wall.E were human, he’d be a young, grubby Woody Allen, with those big anxious eyes of his. (Okay, he may not be much to look at, but you can tell the guy is a love machine.) What follows is the charming and comic tale of Wall.E’s attempts to woo Eve.
Except for the odd word and the mechanical twitterings of the two robots, the first part of the film has little in the way of dialogue. It’s a like watching a silent film — and I like the way they haven’t given Wall.E and Eve voices to make audience empathy easier.
In the second half, Eve is scooped up by the mother ship and, followed by a lovesick Wall.E, taken back to Axiom — a leisure-cruiser spaceship that is owned and run by a global corporation called Buy n Large. It’s here that humanity now resides, and we get a satirical, Aldous Huxley-like swipe at the brave, bloated world of future leisure.
Here, the human race spend their days floating on comfy chairs, talking to each other via computers — even when next to each other — and having every whim catered to by service pods. Consequently, humanity has evolved into a race of obese babies who are incapable of doing anything for themselves. It’s a none too subtle critique of corporate leisure and advertising that aims to keep people passive and consuming. On top of that, we get the whole eco-lecture about the forgotten joys of life on earth — grass and dancing and having a song in your heart.
The trouble with the second half of the film is that it seems to have been written by sci-fi nerds who can’t imagine that other people are not fascinated by space, spaceships and all things robotic. Despite the presence of human characters (Jeff Garlin from Curb Your Enthusiasm plays the Axiom’s captain), there’s nobody we can connect with.
When all the critical ravings die down, I wonder whether, in 10 years’ time, Wall.E will be as popular as, say, The Little Mermaid or Toy Story are today? I doubt it. The film is cute, but ultimately the characters aren’t as impressive as the scenery.
Wall.E: U, 103 mins
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Personally I think the film was better than 2001 - and I don't say that lightly - in that this film actually made sense. 2001 after making some good points just degenerated into psychiodelic imagery (which incidentally had little in common with the book it was adapted from) At least WallE has a plot
Rhys, Aberystwyth,
Can't agree that this film is less than perfect, and it's not didactic in its intent. It carries a message, or two or five -- but it is not in itself a message. (There is a difference.) It's a love story first of all, and a love story of a couple who have a purpose beyond themselves
Lynn Dion, New York, USA
Paul T., London- your seven-year-old has hit the nail on the head there.
At the three screenings I've attended so far, the children in the audience were practically silent- no fidgeting, asking to leave or otherwise acting bored. They seemed as captivated as the adults.
Alice, Edinburgh, UK
Outstanding film.
Boring? I question your intelligence.
J.Wilkes, Gloucester,
I've got to agree with the reviewer on this one. Initially Wall-e's a bold, charming film. But as soon as the scene changes from wasteland to outer space, it loses a great deal and becomes a fairly heavy-handed sermon on the environment and exercise. Laughs are pretty thin on the ground.
Lee Mero, manchester,
I remember seeing a Sam Mendes interview on tv not so long ago. The journalist was particularly critical of some aspects of Mr Mendes' work, to which Sam replied, 'and that is why I direct and you do what you do'.
To Steve in Twickenham. Why comment and agree if you haven't seen the movie?
Jerry, London,
While not everyone has to love this film (or any other) and people have different tastes, I can help thinking that Robert from London is right on the button with his comment.
Paul, London,
I thought Toy Story was much better. It was very boring and I was restless and wished that I could run up and down the aisle except that I am 41.
jah, London, Uk
Not necessarily a great show for the under seven's (7's)... took my grandsons [twins aged six (6) & brother aged four (4)] and they were more frightened than entertained... These are kids that love Harry Potter --- so I am not sure that it is a classic for all the ages. I found it too simplistic!
Glenn Sinclair, Stratford PEI, Canada
Funny isn't? Hailed almost unanimously as a masterpiece, you only give Wall.E three stars. What some people will do to stand out, eh? I knew when I read your review of Iron Man that you were being paid under false pretences.
Robert, London, England
It looks great and has some interesting (though confused) ideas, but it's really, really boring. I was bored; my son who loves robots was bored; many of the younger kids in the cinema spent the last half hour running up and down the aisles.
Philip, Newport, Wales
My 7-year old's verdict: "the best Pixar yet.... I loved the way they didn't talk - so you could think their thoughts."
If it's not quite the best Pixar movie, this leaves anything by Dreamworks, etc, in the dust. Today's kids are lucky to see these moves fresh: they will surely become classics.
Paul T, London , London
Admittedly, without having seen the movie (and I was initially distracted/seduced), I can't help but agree with what has been said here: it sounds all too obvious! And on that note, has anybody noticed the similarity between Wall.E and Number 5/Johnny 5 from Short Circuit? Mmmmmm....?
Steve, Twickenham, UK
I have to agree with your comments. The first half hour is really good, but then it's all downhill. I think Pixar are making a film for adults, as all the children in the audience became restless, and there are few laughs. The trailer for Madagascar 2 (Dreamworks)
got more response.
Ian, Sheffield, UK
well certainly in 10 years time no one will remember you asking the question...
jo, glasgow,