Sarah Vine
Pick up classic Hitchcock thrillers all this week, only in The Times

That Gwyneth Paltrow: at Cannes she silenced critics who called her dowdy by rocking up at the film festival dressed to kill. High hemlines, vertiginous heels, gravity-defying frocks: she worked that red carpet as though her life depended on it. The chorus of approval from fashionistas and drooling (mostly male) film critics was overwhelming, and slightly distasteful.
I wasn’t convinced. Paltrow is a very pretty woman, but it is precisely because she is so pretty that the hard-edged, half-hooker look she sported at Cannes doesn’t suit her. She doesn’t smoulder like Catherine Zeta-Jones (who would do sex vixen if she was working at the checkout in Tesco), and she isn’t cool like Drew Barrymore.
What she does have are enviably delicate features, fine bone structure, luminous skin and a sweet, whimsical gaze. This is why she looked so lovely last weekend, stepping out for dinner in the Hamptons: with hair in a simple ponytail, face genuinely free of make-up, a slight blush to her cheeks and that familiar, wistful smile, she looked not just stunning, but extremely at ease (note her choice of footwear: a pair of flat thong sandals in place of ridiculous heels). Oh my, gasped the combined fashion and beauty worlds, how brave; how chic; how unusual.
And, let’s face it, how very irritating. I can’t be the only woman who looks at the endless parade of perfect bodies and faces that has become the movie industry and consoles herself with the thought that they look that good only because they have an army of personal trainers and stylists to keep them that way. Now, my illusions have been shattered. Gwynnie, it would appear, is just naturally perfect. It’s a cruel world.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Gwyneth Paltrow is lovely looking and has nice clear skin and a pretty face, however, a lot of women I know are just as lovely without makeup.
Sarah, St Andrews,
She is fresh faced pretty, but there really are some models/actors/average women with no makeup on that are stunning. Gwyneth is not nor will ever be stunning. She has bone structure but it isn't that flattering. She is fine. But certainly no great beauty and should not be modeling ever.
emmarose, seattle, wa
Beauty is subjective. That's my understanding and therefore I don't see anything wrong or "catty" with some of the women here not sharing the writer's opinion or considering it fact that Paltrow is a natural beauty. I also don't agree.
By the way, I'm a man, so don't accuse me of being "jealous".
Jake, Reading, U.S.A
Zeta Jones sexy? The woman has very little sensuality at all, Penelope Cruz is an example of a woman who oozes sex appeal. Drew Barrymore is the last person I would have thought of as cool, Paltrow is classic natural beauty and to use the phrase hooker, just makes you sound bitter
James Allport, London, UK
ok alot of you women commenting are just being catty! Gwyneth is, and always has been a beautiful woman- and whether to your taste or not- that shouldn't be denied! It is NOT being jealous that shows that one is secure.
Andrea, Plymouth, MN, USA
Gwyneth Paltrow is an ordinary looking woman. She's by no means unattractive but, as this photo illustrates, she's not a great, natural beauty. Let's save the praise and applause for the barefaced ladies who aren't getting paid millions of dollars to perpetuate beauty myths and photoshop frauds.
Jennifer, East Hampton, USA
She didn't have a nose job, and she has wrinkles on her forehead in some shots--botox is doubtful. And her lips have always been somewhat thick. By "Natural Beauty," they mean she doesn't go out with tons of makeup on to cover her natural flaws. She looks Great, and I wish I looked that great too!
Michele, New York,
I think she is just ordinary. Tall, yes, but ordinary just the same.
Heidi C, Framingham, USA
Look around you Sarah ... you can find many Gwyneth. I would say she's just an ordinary, tall, very often bleach blonded woman who still can't find a style which suit her best after all these years in Hollywood.
margaret, bilbao, spain
I applaud her for having the guts to step out unembellished & show her real face to the world - whether or not it has been 'improved' by surgery. In this shallow society, a woman who does not care for fashion or make-up is derided as dowdy, but why should she not simply be seen as happy in her skin?
elrohana, Leeds, UK
I cant say she floats my boat. I see a woman without any sensuality.
Russell, Lugano, Switzerland
I've seen other photos of Paltrow at this event and they are not nearly as flattering. That said, I wouldn't call her a natural beauty. She looks like an average woman on the street. Nothing wrong with that.
Donna, New York, USA
A 'beauty'? I dont think so. Give her some lippy and we could be looking at Heath Ledgers rival for the role of 'The Joker'. And dont even get me started on her 'skinny-bag-o-bones' body shape.
Stuart, Lincoln, UK
whatever jobs she got done - botox, rhinoplasty, chin,etc. - the bottom line is she looks amazing keeping it like this, no need of dramatic make up or high heels. I totally agree there are loads of "real natural beauties" around, and I am not talking of celebrities. That's life..
monica, London, uk
Same photo, two different reactions: The writer sees luminous, I see an oily shine. The writer sees flat sandals as a fashion epiphany, I see typical Hamptons summer footwear. Sarah Vine has written a breathy, I-am-not-worthy tongue bath. It doesn't suit an adult. I am embarassed for her.
Susan, Brussels, Belgium
You are correct, Charles! Gwyneth Paltrow can be seen in many "before and after" pictures on the internet showing rhinoplasty (nose job) and chin augmentation.
Sarah Vine, please do your homework BEFORE holding her up as a natural beauty,
Jan
Jan Jansen, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sarah, there are naturally perfect people all around us - you don't have to go to Cannes film fest to find them...Tesco's might just surprise you!
Brendan, Melbourne, Australia
Naturally Perfect? Looking at the picture, I see signs of a nose job. I also suspect her of a little botox treatment.
Charles, Rotterdam, Netherlands