Martin Samuel, Chief Football Correspondent
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Classic Times Fantasy Football is back. We got two great games for you to play and £100K to be won
For Arsenal supporters, there was good news and bad news from the Champions League draw yesterday. The good news is that, according to Danny Fiszman, the director and a significant shareholder, if Arsène Wenger walked into his office this morning and requested £30 million for a striker, the funds would be made available in an instant. The bad news? He has not, and Fiszman does not think he will, either.
And so the minutes tick away until the transfer window shuts on Monday and still the tumbleweed blows across Arsenal’s Hertfordshire training ground, as Wenger sits in front of the latest raft of ProZone reports, shuffling a group of players only he is convinced can mount a serious challenge to Manchester United and Chelsea this season.
The Barclays Premier League’s elite four were all present at the Grimaldi Forum in Monte Carlo last night, Chelsea players laden with Uefa awards, United confident in their position as Europe’s team to beat, Rick Parry, the Liverpool chief executive, bearing the look of a man who dare not answer his mobile phone and Fiszman representing a club who have seen some of their best players picked off by rivals this summer and are yet to respond with conviction.
In the red part of North London, the locals are not happy. An accident-prone defender, Philippe Senderos, has been replaced by one who is equally fallible and older in Mikaël Silvestre, Samir Nasri will take the place of Alexander Hleb, but it is too early to know whether Arsenal have traded up, while there is no holding midfield player to fill the hole left by Mathieu Flamini.
Some now view Wenger’s pursuit of youth and beauty as nothing more than indulgence. They want Wenger to buy, and big, and suspect that, because he does not, Arsenal lack funding. Fiszman is insistent that this is not true. His statements will placate sections of the Arsenal crowd, but not all. Many will still question why Wenger takes pride in hoarding a pile of cash where a pile of trophies could be.
“If Arsène said he needed £30 million for a striker, he would get it, no problem at all,” Fiszman said. “It is not our decision who he spends money on and nor will it ever be. We totally back Arsène, but there is a dual problem for him. If we were to buy the sort of big names that people talk about, we would be looking at relatively mature players who then need to be integrated into the way we play.
“Secondly, it impacts on the youngsters, and in many cases Arsène thinks it is quicker for us to bring a player through our system. But that does not mean all we are interested in is the artistic achievement award. We are not settling for second-best. We want to win trophies and I think it is time we did, but Arsène also believes in creating teams with a certain style.
“There were great hopes that we would buy heavily this summer. But I would refute that we have not bought well. Nasri has two goals in two games at the Emirates Stadium, and if Arsène could find the right player, he would buy again, but he hasn’t.
“I hear all the time that we have no money, but I just wish someone would take the time to look at our accounts. This is a proper business which produces its own cash and lives or dies by its performances. Our net payments are £20 million and the revenue increase from the new stadium is close to £50 million. Explain to me how that stadium is a drain on the club, when it produces an extra £30 million a year.
“This constant suggestion that the stadium is bleeding us dry is crap. The reality is our wage bill is very similar to Manchester United, substantially above Liverpool and substantially below Chelsea - but that is to be expected. We pay good salaries, but we pay them more evenly, so we do not have extremes of very high and very low wage-earners. There is an ethos of a team effort."
If Arsenal’s finances were as bleak as suggested, Fiszman could not have put such a brave face on the Champions League draw, with its long trips to Istanbul and Ukraine. Arsenal play Blackburn Rovers and Bolton Wanderers either side of a match away to Dynamo Kiev, on September 17, the sort of sequence it is said that shatters their delicate equilibrium.
Liverpool have fared little better with a group that could be problematic. Fernando Torres returns to Atlético Madrid, which is nice for him, but not perhaps for his teammates, considering the demolition of Schalke 04 that got his former club into the group stage. PSV Eindhoven are technically impressive and Marseilles caused Liverpool problems last season before order was restored in their second meeting. Even so, not easy.
The plum draw for United was a meeting with Celtic, but it is indicative of how repetitive these Champions League occasions are becoming that this pairing drew only a fleeting excitement in the hall. United have met Celtic at this stage before, and recently; Rangers, too. These days, it is the journeys into the unknown that are most captivating, even if we probably know the result of the match before we set off.
To which end, all hail CFR 1907 Cluj, champions of Romania and host to Chelsea on October 1. From the city of Cluj-Napoca in northwestern Transylvania - home to the Cheeky Girls, incidentally - they are the first team outside of Bucharest to win the domestic league in 17 years, capping a meteoric rise from third-division status only six years ago.
New money has helped to forge a partnership with Benfica, of Portugal, and populated the team with Latin imports, mainly from South America. Cluj were the first team to field a starting XI without a single Romanian national. Right up Chelsea’s alley, as the Cheeky Girls might say.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Mitch 1972- I believe Arsenal became the massive club they're now after the double winning season 2002. It proved that 97/98 was no fluke for Wenger. And btw ljunberg came in 98 not after Henry and co.
Dezy, Orlando, USA
You have to spend money to build a team and not just rely on youth. Year 2000 was the most defining year Arsenal became the massive club that it is today. Henry, Wiltord and Pires came at a price, Ljunberg and Sol came later. This consolidating a team already comprising Adams, Keown and Vieira.
Mitch 1972, London, UK
Darren, melbourne. You are right, he has spent over the last 10 years. But everyone knows that in comparison the United, Chelsea, Liverpool etc (teams he wants to compete with) that list of players is a drop in the ocean compared to their expenditure
TG, London,
Wenger has Arsenal's interests at heart - whilst the glory is massive to him, so is seeing the club free of the debt from the stadium - he looks at the long term, unlike all these fickle fans that demand so much instantly, sometimes a gradual process is needed - that's the sacrifice of a new stadium
G S, Edinburgh, UK
There have been many times down the years that the press and the fans have doubted SAF and he has always proved the doubters wrong, can we not afford the same for Wenger?
andrew, London,
Russ, Benfleet - how is Wenger's approach "proven"? By no trophies in ages? His success pre-Abramovich is pretty irrelevant now, Chelsea have changed the rules of the game. Utd have had to scale up their buying, if Arsenal want to match their success in taking Chelsea on they must do so too
Mathew, Leeds, UK
Arsene comes on french tv a lot and one thing i can guarentee is that he will never buy Barry " He's a diesel type player, i buy rolls royce's"
Nasri is way better than hleb so we traded up there. Just waiting on a Flamini replacement and the season begins in Earnest
Allez les gunners
James, Nantes, France
@Darren, Melb. - Those 14 players cited played between now and 1999 so over nearly a 10 year period £113 in transfer fees is insignificant. Compared to the likes of Man United have spent that that figure on 3 or 4 players (Rio, Carrick, Rooney, Hargreaves) for example...
Sharpe, Wick, Caithness
Darren from Melbourne - Wenger may have spent £113m or so on the players you listed, but that is over a 10 year period (what next, using Lee Chapman and Ian Wright as further examples)! Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool et al spend that in 2 to 3 years, which is why we're in danger of falling behind.
SP, London, UK
We heard exactly the same criticisms last season and then went on to have a very strong season. Arsenal's model of not chasing short term success through expensive purchases is proven and if a journalist is stupid enough to argue against Wenger's approach, he will end up with egg all over his face
Russ, Benfleet, England
Some, so-called, Arsenal fans have incredibly short memories. George Graham had a short spell of success and apart from that time and until Wenger, we were also-rans. Wenger is building a team.
Wenger is one of the great managers. This is recognised by everyone, apart from some Arsenal fans.
Marc, Paris, France
When he does spend he buys quality. To say he doesn''t spend big is short sighted. How much did he spend in Walcott? Every player he bought has gone on to became a world class player. The only flops he made were Wiltord (who wanted to play forward) & Jeffers, who's English and was over-rated.
Sara Cen, London,
i think that the best manager ever Mr.Wenger must spend this money for one man and he its De Rossi from Roma he its perfect midfield player for fabregas.With that midfield every trophey .
reserve for arsenal
dzenan, sarajevo, bosnia
Alonso plays well with Cesc for Spain because they have Senna sitting behind them. It's the Senna-type player we need, not Alonso. Alonso-Cesc would be our our Lampard-Gerrard conundrum.
Neal, Reading, UK
Fizmen is right on most accouonts, but someone like Alonso to me is better value then the lad from Holland. It would not be hard to integrate him into the system at all. the Euros proved he plays well with Cesc, that is a no brainer!!
Marty Price, Oakland, United States
Because he bought that lot over a period of a decade, rather than one summer. How much have Spurs spent this summer, or Utd last? Half the amount you quote. Wenger may be frugal but he gets it right most of the time.
John Williams, Adelaide, Australia
I think that Mr. wegner is a excellent company " yes Man". I think he had 70 millions last year to spend this year. they couldn"t pay Flemini a good wage to keep him. How they have 30millions to buy a striker or A midfield player. Liverpool wantaway player goes for 16 millions. why not buy him.
Adaman, Baltimore, USA
Thank god Fiszman nails the lie of the 'Arsene Knows' brigade that there's no money. AFC declared a £30m profit last year - Wenger should've spent £25m on a centreback and winger. The club's decline is ALL down to his weird obsession in trying to run it as a creche - and stubborness not to change.
Buddy Jones, London,
Where has the myth of Wenger never spending big come from? Henry, Wiltord, Nasri, Reyes, Walcott, Hleb, Overmars, Jeffers, Wright, Adebayor, Pires, Vieira, Rosicky, Gilberto. Correct me if I'm wrong but that lot add up to a tidy little 113 million give or take a couple of mill, and there's been more
Darren, melbourne, australia